Skip to main content

Brodtmann v. Duke

Citations

  • 708 So. 2d 447
  • 1998 WL 56600

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing the trial court’s vast discretion with regard to the admission of evidence on the grounds of relevance
  • emphasizing the trial court's vast discretion with regard to the admission of evidence on the grounds of relevance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Plotkin, Jones and Ciaccio

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.