Brodsky v. New England School of Law

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that plaintiff did not state a 93A claim based on graduate school’s decision not to allow him to retake courses he failed because the school’s decision was part of the university’s core mission of providing education and was not engaging in trade or commerce
• “Because the Court concludes that NESL was not engaged in ‘trade or commerce’ for the purpose of Chapter 93A, Brodsky’s claims under that statute will be dismissed[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).