Skip to main content
· 3/28/2001

Brodetski v. Duffey

Citations

  • 141 F. Supp. 2d 35
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9022
  • 2001 WL 427281

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[p]laintiff s ... complaint concerning work inequity alleg[ing] that defendants required him to do the same work that employees did in higher positions[,]” was “the level of personnel decision-making in which courts should not meddle.”
  • finding that receiving heavier workload on a temporary and infrequent basis is not materially adverse and that employees should expect to shoulder an “extra load” on occasion
  • noting that employees should expect to shoulder an “extra load” on occasion
  • reasoning that the imposition of a heavier workload is not a materially adverse action
  • finding no adverse employment actions in the claim that defendants distributed workload unevenly by overloading plaintiff with assignments
  • “Many of the alleged incidents, while unpleasant, amounted to little more than everyday workplace disputes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.