Skip to main content
· 9/20/2004

Broderick v. Donaldson

Citations

  • 338 F. Supp. 2d 30
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18910
  • 2004 WL 2166165

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that courts “seldom have accepted time lapses outside of a year in length” as sufficient temporal proximity
  • stating that the elements of a Title VII retaliation claim are (1) engaging in a statutorily protected activity, (2) an adverse employment action, and (3) a causal connection between the two

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.