BROCKUM CO., DIV. OF KRIMSON v. Various John Does

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the necessary predicates for enjoining [persons under 21 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 65] is in personam jurisdiction and venue, neither of which have been adequately established by a competent showing in this action”
• expressing concern “because in personam jurisdiction was unclear and the proceeding lacked the requisite adversary interest”
• granting TRO for a concert within the court’s jurisdiction, but denying nationwide preliminary injunction due to personal jurisdiction and enforceability problems
• granting TRO for a concert within the court’s jurisdiction, but denying nationwide preliminary injunction due to personal jurisdiction and enforceability problems
• “[T]he use of plainclothes personnel to serve and enforce court orders of this type may be more conducive to violence than to discouraging bootlegging.”
• “[T]he existence of an economic or societal problem does not necessarily mean that judicial power can or must deal with it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).