Skip to main content
· 6/15/1874

Brockschmidt v. Hagebusch

Citations

  • 72 Ill. 562

Syllabus

<p>Mortgage—effect of subsequent agreement as to application of payments. A husband and wife executed a mortgage upon their homestead to secure an indebtedness of the husband, and the wife released her dower and homestead. A portion of the debt was subsequently paid, and the amount indorsed on the note. Afterwards, the husband, by an arrangement with the mortgagee, agreed that the payment made on the mortgage debt should be applied on another indebtedness, and the note with the credit on it was given up, and another note, of same date and amount, executed and delivered, with the agreement that the mortgage should stand as security for it: Seld, that, on a bill to foreclose, the wife was entitled to have the amount of the payments credited on the mortgage debt, and that, as against her, the mortgage could only be foreclosed for the balance due after deducting the pay, ments, but that, as against the husband, the complainant was entitled to foreclose for the whole amount of the original debt in accordance with the last agreement.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deputy sheriff and employee of the sheriff with financial interest in the case
  • deputy sheriff and employee of the sheriff with financial interest in the case
  • deputy sheriff constitutionally cannot serve on a jury
  • deputy sheriff constitutionally cannot serve on a jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breese

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.