Brockman v. Georgia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the ICFA “is liberally construed” to “protect consumers from unfair methods of competition and other unfair and deceptive business practices” (citing Robinson v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp., 775 N.E.2d 951, 960 (Ill. 2002))
• recounting a case where a consumer must choose between losing his investment and obtaining an overpriced product he did not want
• recounting a case where a consumer must choose between losing his investment and obtaining an overpriced product he did not want
• recounting a case where a consumer must choose between losing his investment and obtaining an overpriced product he did not want
• discussing Illinois public policy regarding antitrust violations, but not discussing the de minimis doctrine
• determining an argument was forfeited because it was \perfunctory and underdeveloped\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).