Brock v. Weaver Bros., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying Rule 56(f) relief because “approximately three years had elapsed since the accident ... [and] no discovery ... had been undertaken”
• “Assuming that an unambiguous request for additional time was made pursuant to Civil Rule 56(f)....”
• denial of Rule 56(f) request for additional time affirmed where no discovery had been taken during three-year period between accident and resolution of summary judgment motion
• where only one set of interrogatories had been requested in three year period since accident, it was not an abuse of discretion to deny request for additional time to conduct discovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).