Brock v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that supplemental local rule expressly allowed trial court to reconsider “any previously-filed motions”
• declining to find that a binder existed, but noting that “it is possible for a binder to be made part of an application for insurance”
• “[W]e do not construe statutes in a manner that is grammatically untenable.”
• “[W]e do not construe statutes in a manner that is grammatically untenable.”
• “[W]e do not construe statutes in a manner that is grammatically untenable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).