Brock v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that because a post conviction proceeding “focuses on the validity of what occurred at the trial proceeding, the movant’s present mental condition is irrelevant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Taqwa Thompson v. State of Missouri
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2014-03-25· cited 14×
• Demarco McCrady, Movant/Appellant v. State of Missouri
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2015-03-17· cited 14×
• McKee v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2011-02-01· cited 10×
• Charron v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2008-06-17· cited 9×
• Mayes v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2011-08-01· cited 3×
• Craig v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2013-10-08· cited 1×
• David A. McNeal v. State of Missouri
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2016-02-16
• Maurice R. Hogan v. State of Missouri
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2021-08-03
• Parks v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2018-06-12
• Dept. of Health v. Sheffield
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2020-07-29

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• People v. Owens
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1990-11-30· cited 219×
• Barnett v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2003-04-22· cited 123×
• Colleen Mary Rohan, Ex Rel. Oscar Gates v. Jeanne Woodford, Warden
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-06-25· cited 85×
• Edwards v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2006-09-26· cited 66×
• Jackson v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2006-11-07· cited 37×
• Shaw v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1985-01-15· cited 34×
• Abel v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1987-09-15· cited 5×
• State v. Brock
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2004-05-04· cited 1×