Brock v. Connecticut Union of Telephone Workers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “Defendant has provided no evidence which refutes either the violation or the inference that [violation] affected the outcome of the election” and ordering new election
• motive of “setting the record straight” did not excuse or prevent finding of violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).