Skip to main content
· 7/12/2018

Brobst v. Lyndhurst

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 2725

Syllabus

Summary judgment ordinance home occupation retail store sale of goods abuse of discretion statutory construction unambiguous, clear meaning expressio unius est exclusio alterius. The trial court erred by granting summary judgment in favor of the city. The trial court's finding is not supported by the broad definition of a \home occupation\ set forth in L.C.O. 1150.09(c)(73). However, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying the city's motion to submit additional evidentiary materials in support of its motion for summary judgment. 105849 - Paul J. Brobst, Et al. v. Lyndhurst

Judges: Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.