Skip to main content
· 7/2/1987

Broadwell Realty Services, Inc. v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of NY

Citations

  • 528 A.2d 76
  • 218 N.J. Super. 516

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing “that the cost of complying with an injunctive decree does not ordinarily fall within” the definition of “damages,” yet holding that certain cleanup expenses are covered by CGL policy
  • providing the most complete and scholarly account of the origin and development of the pollution exclusion clause in CGL policies
  • differentiating between expenditures for prevention of damage to other parties’ properties and expenditures for damage to insured’s property
  • applying Oregon law and holding \discharge of pollution into water causes damage to tangible property and hence cleanup costs are recoverable under a property damage liability clause\
  • “The exclusion was designed to decrease claims for losses caused by pollution by providing an incentive to industry to improve its manufacturing and disposal processes”
  • \The exclusion was designed to decrease claims for losses caused by pollution by providing an incentive to industry to improve its manufacturing and disposal processes\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Pressler, Gaulkin and Baime

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.