B.R.K. v. Goldberg
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 1243
Syllabus
Habeas corpus child custody restraining orders jurisdiction R.C. 3113.31 R.C. 3109.043 Americans with Disabilities Act and adequate remedy. The court dismissed a habeas corpus action seeking to dissolve restraining orders in a divorce case and a domestic violence protection case that prevented a father from having visitation or custody with his daughter. Pursuant to R.C. 3113.31 and 3109.043, the trial court had jurisdiction to issue the orders. Appeal is an adequate remedy at law to contest possible violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the restraining orders.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- appeal reinstated where the judge failed to explain her finding of inexcusable neglect, yet “it seems clear that there was a sustained effort to comply”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sheehan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.