Brizendine v. Parker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• awarding $50,000 in statutory 13 damages for cyberpiracy under similar facts, where plaintiff asserted lost profits of 14 $204,000
• noting this factor “favors default judgment when the defendant has been properly served”
• noting this factor “favors default judgment when the defendant has been properly served”
• noting default cannot be attributed 11 to excusable neglect after proper service
• “Where a plaintiff has filed a well-pleaded complaint, the possibility of dispute 27 concerning material facts is remote.”
• “Where a plaintiff has filed 9 a well-pleaded complaint, the possibility of dispute concerning material facts is 10 remote.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).