Skip to main content
· 5/4/1960

Britz v. Kinsvater

Citations

  • 351 P.2d 986
  • 87 Ariz. 385
  • 1960 Ariz. LEXIS 173

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining an appellant concedes the accuracy of the trial court’s findings when uncontested on appeal
  • “Inasmuch as the trial court’s findings of fact are not themselves challenged by this appeal, we may assume that their accuracy is conceded.”
  • by failing to challenge the accuracy of findings, a party concedes the accuracy on appeal
  • “[W]e adhere to the policy that it is generally not our role to sua sponte address issues not raised by the appellant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Udall, Struckmeyer, Phelps, Johnson, Bernstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.