Britz v. Consolidated Casinos Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where the evidence conflicts and sufficient evidence supports the district court, this court should affirm
• detailing that the movant bears the burden of establishing grounds for NRCP 60(b)(1) relief by a preponderance of the evidence
• “trial judge is free to judiciously and reasonably exercise discretion in determining whether a default judgment should be set aside”
• \Litigants and their counsel may not properly be allowed to disregard process or procedural rules with impunity.\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “A point not urged in the trial court, unless it goes to the jurisdiction of that court, is deemed to have been waived and will not be considered on appeal.”
• “failure of a plaintiff to comply with [the particularity requirement of pleading fraud] ... only subjects the complaint to a motion for a more definite statement, or at the very worst to dismissal with leave to amend” (citing Sax v. Sax, 294 F.2d 133 (5th Cir.1961))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).