Britton v. Wooten

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• subrogation allowed because there was no clause requiring purchase of fire insurance by landlord
• third-party intentional/criminal acts do not supersede where such conduct is among the hazards that make the defendant negligent
• no superseding cause where the harm was among the hazards making the conduct negligent
• adopting §§ 448, 449, 302B

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).