· 10/25/1990
Britton v. City of North Las Vegas
Citations
- 799 P.2d 568
- 106 Nev. 690
- 1990 Nev. LEXIS 117
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that an administrative decision can have a preclusive effect on a future case only if it resulted in a final judgment on the merits
- stating that an administrative decision can have a preclusive effect on a future case only if it resulted in a final judgment on the merits
- stating that an administrative decision can have a preclusive effect on a future case only if it resulted in a final judgment on the merits
- stating that an administrative decision can have a preclusive effect on a future case only if it resulted in a final judgment on the merits
- stating that an administrative decision can have a preclusive effect on a future case only if it resulted in a final judgment on the merits
- stating that an administrative decision can have a preclusive effect on a future case only if it resulted in a final judgment on the merits
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.