Skip to main content
· 8/11/1997

Brittingham v. United States

Citations

  • 972 F. Supp. 1014
  • 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11961
  • 1997 WL 464515

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, because employee discipline is within the ordinary course of the business and the employer’s supervisory role, a supervisor’s alleged battery of an employee was within the scope of his duties
  • because the service of disciplining an employee is within the ordinary course of the business and the employer’s supervisory role, a supervisor’s alleged assault of an employee was within the scope of his duties
  • evaluating vicarious liability on a motion to dismiss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.