Skip to main content
· 4/7/2015

Brittingham v. Town of Georgetown

Citations

  • 113 A.3d 519
  • 39 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1832
  • 2015 Del. LEXIS 181
  • 2015 WL 1569191

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The Superior Court has broad discretion to deny a petition where the legal duty is unclear or the petitioner has another remedy available.”
  • “[M]andamus is not the proper remedy to compel the undoing of acts already done or the correction of errors or wrongs already perpetrated[.]” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “[T]he technical and nonprejudicial nature of the LEOBOR violation at issue here did not rise to the level of a due process violation. Accordingly, the relief Appellants request is not within the scope of mandamus.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Strine, Holland, Valihura

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.