Britten v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is well-settled that Apprendi[1] and Blakely[2] errors are subject to a harmless error analysis . . . .” (citing Washington v. Recuenco, 548 U.S. 212, 220–21 (2006))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Wolfe, M.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-06-20· cited 265×
• In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report 2018-13.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2019-06-06· cited 2×
• ALEXIS J. CARTAGENA v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-01-10· cited 1×
• Richard Rex Capra v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-02-07
• Erester Markque Ashford v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-03-07

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
• Blakely v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
• Alleyne v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2013-06-17· cited 5,868×
• Washington v. Recuenco
  Supreme Court· 2006-06-26· cited 1,105×
• Galindez v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-02-15· cited 159×
• Lee v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-11-27· cited 8×
• Lindsay v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-01-09· cited 5×
• Espinoza-Montes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-12-16· cited 2×
• Bruce v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-08-20· cited 2×