Britt v. Schindler Elevator Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the argument that “all implied warranties are necessarily continuing and that [the] claim falls within the ‘future performance’ exception to Section 28:2-725(2)”
• plain language of “any action” is broad and includes actions excluded by statute
• exception clause “applies only when a warranty explicitly extends to future performance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).