Britt v. Phoenix Indemnity Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that a court should only go on to the second and third Britt prongs if the active accessory requirement has been met
• stating that this Court can raise a jurisdictional issue sua sponte
• raising sua sponte whether the district court’s order was final because the Court lacks jurisdiction to review on appeal a non-final order
• adopting a three-part test articulated by the supreme courts of Colorado and Minnesota
• describing the Minnesota test and applying it to the facts of the case
• “[A]s far as the merits of the controversy are concerned, the court is finished with the case when it goes to the arbitrators.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).