Skip to main content
· 11/12/1998

Brito v. County of Palm Beach

Citations

  • 753 So. 2d 109
  • 1998 WL 821757

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing summary judgment on failure to warn claim and explaining that “[t]he sufficiency and reasonableness of a manufacturer’s warnings are fact questions appropriate for the jury to decide unless such warnings are ‘accurate, clear, and unambiguous.’”
  • manufacturer has “a strict duty to warn of its product’s dangerous propensities only in those instances where the commodity is inherently dangerous”
  • “A warning should contain some wording directed to the significant dangers arising from failure to use the product in the prescribed manner, such as the risk of serious injury or death.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Polen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.