British Car Auctions, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant’s request for a continuance because defendant failed to show a “particularized need” for the continuance
• pursuant to R.C. 2945.37, if the issue of competency is raised “during trial,” the court must hold a hearing only for good cause shown
• Revealing prior testimony to a prospective witness is “highly improper”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).