· 4/5/1995
Britamco Underwriters, Inc. v. Stokes
Citations
- 881 F. Supp. 196
- 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4694
- 1995 WL 214605
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the insured had no duty to defend assault and battery claims against its employee because such acts were intentional and not “occurrences: within the limits of the policy”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Katz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.