Bristol Window and Door, Inc. v. Hoogenstyn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, in enacting MCL 445.774a, the Legislature intended to revive the common-law standards for the enforceability of noncompetition agreements
• discussing existence of common-law rule against enforcing agreements for unreasonable restraint of trade even “before any statutory scheme of business regulation existed in Michigan”
• enforcing non-compete agreement, and noting long history of enforcing such agreements in Michigan
• enforcing a three-year, statewide non-competition agreement
• enforcing a three-year, statewide non-competition agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).