Brissette v. Milner Chevrolet Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding physical presence of defective object is not essential to claim; plaintiff may present testimony, subject to cross-examination, that indicates existing defects
• “We do not in any manner encourage a party to be lax concerning the preservation of evidence. We do not in any way imply that a party is under no duty to preserve the object for discovery and evi-dentiary purposes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).