Skip to main content
· 9/3/2021

Brisker v. Ohio Dept. of Ins.

Citations

  • 178 N.E.3d 1
  • 2021 Ohio 3141

Syllabus

CIVIL-ADMINISTRATIVELAW-INSURANCE - Common pleas court did not abuse its discretion by finding Department of Insurance's order revoking Appellant's insurance license was supported by reliable, probative, and substantial evidence where: (1) Appellant stipulated to impersonation of a client and (2) evidence supported finding that Appellant knew or should have known document submitted to support his disability claim was forged also, common pleas court did not abuse its discretion when it determined department's order was in accordance with the law and principles of due process while there must be strict compliance with the administrative hearing process outlined in Chapter 119, Appellant provided no authority in support of his argument that R.C. 119.09 mandates that an order of the Department of Insurance must be mailed to the affected parties and their attorneys or other representatives of record simultaneously.

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.