Skip to main content
· 5/28/1992

Briseno v. City of Santa Ana

Citations

  • 6 Cal. App. 4th 1378
  • 8 Cal. Rptr. 2d 486
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 7225
  • 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4555
  • 1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 676

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]nvalid provisions of a statute should be severed whenever possible to preserve the validity of the remainder of the statute.”
  • the unconstitutional word did “not even appear in [the] section” at issue
  • the unconstitutional word did “not even appear in [the] section” at issue
  • analyzing the “overall statutory scheme” to determine legislative intent
  • analyzing the “overall statutory scheme” to determine legislative intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sills

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.