· 7/2/2015
Briscoe v. Kerry
Citations
- 111 F. Supp. 3d 46
- 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86317
- 2015 WL 4055471
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that claims brought in a separate, untimely EEOC action cannot be “piggybacked onto [the plaintiff’s] timely filed civil action” as such piggybacking would circumvent the purpose of the deadlines
- ‘For Title VII and the ADEA, however,-these time limits are subject to equitable tolling, estoppel, and waiver. ... Such doctrines are not applicable to jurisdictional deadlines such as those imposed by the Rehabilitation Act’s exhaustion requirements,
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Emmet G. Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.