District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 10/9/2008

Brisbon v. United States

Citations

957 A.2d 931
2008 D.C. App. LEXIS 413
2008 WL 4499969

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“Some courts draw a distinction between deceptive and truthful pressure tactics involving family members.” Citing Johnson, 351 F.3d 254, 263, and Armstead, 978 So. 2d 642, 648
officers falsely told suspect that mother and grandmother had been arrested: “cautioning that the kind of deception employed here, involving supposed harm to vulnerable family members, could well cross the line beyond the type of tactics vel non that a court will tolerate”
“It is black letter law in this jurisdiction that an appellate court cannot consider anything which is not part of the record in the case; therefore[,] [m]aterials that have only been included in briefs, but are not part of the record cannot be considered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ruiz, Farrell, Belson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Brisbon v. United States

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.