Briody v. De Kimpe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the [c]ourt consider[ed] the three factors emphasized in Stern: 1
• considering the fact that the bankruptcy court could not conduct a jury trial in analyzing a motion to withdraw the reference to the bankruptcy court
• finding a benefit to uniform bankruptcy administration where claims focused on specific provisions of the Bankruptcy Code
• finding that delay alone does not necessarily indicate forum shopping
• “A creditor may subject itself to the binding authority of the bankruptcy court by filing a proof of claim against the bankrupt estate.”
• common-law claims for negligence and breach of fiduciary duty “involve non-core proceedings and are indisputably private rights”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).