Brinser v. Longenecker & Bausman
Citations
- 169 Pa. 51
- 32 A. 60
- 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1067
Syllabus
<p>Sale — Warranty—Charge of court.</p> <p>In an action to recover money paid for cattle, plaintiff averred in his statement that the suit was founded on a breach of warranty of the cattle. The principal contention was as to whether there was a warranty or not. There was evidence that two of the heifers purchased of defendants were never delivered. Held, that, in the absence of a request to instruct as to the item of claim based on the nondelivery, it was not error to fail to give such instruction.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no impoundment of funds where the Governor closed a state hospital and the legislature thereafter appropriated no funds for its continued operation
- finding no impoundment of funds where the Governor closed a state hospital and the legislature thereafter appropriated no funds for its continued operation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cue, Dean, Fell, Mitchell, Stebbett, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.