Brinkmeier v. BIC CORP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing false marking claim where “allegations that BIC is sophisticated and employs experienced counsel do not suggest an intent to deceive.”
• finding insufficient plaintiffs allegations that defendant knew patents had expired merely because it updated product packaging following patent expiration
• agreeing with other district courts that Rule 9(b) applies to section 292 claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).