Brinkman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding a jury instruction that the specific intent in a burglary may be presumed from an unlawful entry was an accurate statement of the law
• 161 day delay between time information was filed and trial not prejudicial to defendant when delay mostly occasioned by actions of defendant or his attorney
• 161 day delay between time information was filed and trial not prejudicial to defendant when delay mostly occasioned by actions of defendant or his attorney
• disqualification not required where prosecutor defended accused on an unrelated charge six years prior to instant case
• disqualification not required where prosecutor defended accused on an unrelated charge six years prior to instant case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).