Brinkley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing and remanding for successor judge to conduct de novo hearing on motions to suppress
• “ ‘[T]he existing law of Florida is that a successor judge may not enter an order or judgment based upon evidence heard by the predecessor.’ ” (quoting Beattie v. Beattie, 536 So.2d 1078, 1079 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Barrentine v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-02-13· cited 5×
• Berube v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-04-23· cited 2×
• State v. Pablo-Ramirez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-05-27

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Beattie v. Beattie
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-11-09· cited 14×
• Roberts v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-12· cited 2×