Skip to main content

Brinkley v. State

Citations

  • 708 P.2d 1026
  • 101 Nev. 676
  • 1985 Nev. LEXIS 487

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • characterizing reasons for substituting counsel as \unnoteworthy\ when due to displeasure with a lack of communication and a newfound ability to afford private counsel
  • characterizing 20 reasons for substituting counsel as “unnoteworthy” when due to displeasure with a lack of communication and a newfound ability to 21 afford private counsel
  • characterizing 23 reasons for substituting counsel as “unnoteworthy” when due to displeasure with a lack of communication and a newfound ability to 24 afford private counsel
  • “The offense must tend to establish a preconceived plan which resulted in commission of the charged crime.”
  • \The offense must tend to establish a preconceived plan which resulted in commission of the charged crime.\
  • “Ordinarily, denial of 14 such a motion for continuance, immediately prior to trial, is within the discretion of the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.