Brinkley v. Brinkley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \[c]onclusions or opinions based on pure speculation are worthless to the trier of fact.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lipsig v. Ramlawi
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-29· cited 66×
• Elliott v. Elliott
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-11-20· cited 4×
• Williams v. Williams
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-08-20· cited 1×
• Richmond v. State Title & Guaranty Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-09-26

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• US Casualty Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1951-10-05· cited 261×
• National Labor Relations Board v. A. S. Abell Co.
  Fourth Circuit· 1938-07-14· cited 66×
• Husky Industries, Inc. v. Black
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-07-06· cited 49×
• Florida Rate Conf. v. FLORIDA RAILRO & PU COM'N
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1959-01-09· cited 45×
• Bergh v. Bergh
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1961-03-07· cited 40×
• Gains v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-07-13· cited 28×
• White v. Valley Land Company
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1957-12-02· cited 23×
• Milford Copper Co. v. Industrial Commission
  Utah Supreme Court· 1922-11-24· cited 16×
• Vecta Contract, Inc. v. Lynch
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-01-25· cited 14×
• Dent v. Dent
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-09-21· cited 14×
• Reece v. Reece
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-04-11· cited 11×
• Matos v. Matos
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-10-01· cited 11×
• Gleason v. Gleason
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-08-15· cited 4×
• Wilson v. Wilson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-07-30· cited 3×