Skip to main content
· 11/19/1964

Brink v. Griffith

Citations

  • 396 P.2d 793
  • 65 Wash. 2d 253
  • 1964 Wash. LEXIS 472

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiff not entitled to twice recover under defamation and invasion of privacy claims for same elements of damage growing out of same occurrence
  • plaintiff not entitled to twice recover under defamation and invasion of privacy claims for same elements of damage growing out of same occurrence
  • invasion of privacy action primarily concerned with compensation for injured feelings or mental suffering
  • invasion of privacy action primarily concerned with compensation for injured feelings or mental suffering

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.