Bringgold v. City of Spokane
Citations
- 19 Wash. 333
- 53 P. 368
- 1898 Wash. LEXIS 374
Syllabus
<p>COSTS — WHAT ITEMS PROPER — RETAXATION — TIME FOR MOTION — WRIT OF. REVIEW.</p> <p>Where, in a judgment for costs in favor of the prevailing party, the costs are taxed in blank, the failure of the losing party to move for retaxation within ten days after entry of judgment will not constitute a waiver of the right to retaxation.</p> <p>Stenographers’ fees for attendance at court and transcribing testimony cannot be taxed against the losing party.</p> <p>The office of a writ of review being to enforce the judgment which should have been rendered by the lower tribunal, where the lower tribunal has no jurisdiction to adjudge costs the superior court would be without jurisdiction to enter judgment for the costs incurred before such lower tribunal.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- testimony that defendant at time of crime \appeared like he was a pretty mad man\ held admissible
- \The admissibility of testimony does not depend upon its sufficiency to prove the issue\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dunbar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.