Briner Electric Co. v. Sachs Electric Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• competition is a legitimate economic interest and valid justification for interference with a business expectancy as long as the defendant did not employ improper means
• \[W]rongful means would generally entail either an illegal act or an act that is actionable in and of itself.\
• “these acts, while perhaps unsporting, do not rise to the level of wrongfulness”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).