Brindley v. Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that because wind and rain were concurrent causes, only one of which was covered, insured could not demonstrate \without resort to sheer conjecture the amount of the particular loss ascribable to the hazard assumed by the carrier\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).