Skip to main content
· 7/1/1910

Brillinger v. Northern Central Railway

Citations

  • 229 Pa. 182
  • 78 A. 88
  • 1910 Pa. LEXIS 569

Syllabus

<p>Negligence — Railroads—Loss by fire — Sparks—Evidence.</p> <p>1. In an action against a railroad company to recover for loss by fire, from sparks, the case is for the jury, where there is testimony tending to show that a few minutes before the fire was discovered the defendant ran an engine on a siding within a few feet of plaintiff’s building and because of the engineer’s carelessness, sparks of a size too large to escape through a proper spark arrester were thrown upon the building, setting it on fire.</p> <p>Practice, C. P. — Appeals—Variance—Allegata and probata.</p> <p>2. After a trial on its merits a judgment will not be reversed because of a variance which was not questioned at the trial, and which did the defendant no harm and could have been cured by amendment if attention had been called to it.</p>

Judges: Brown, Elkin, Fell, Mestrezat, Moschzisker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.