Brill v. Marandola

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Questions as to the sufficiency of an expert’s factual basis are generally left to the jury.” (quoting JMJ Enters. V. Via Veneto Italian Ice, No. 97-0652, 1998 WL 175888, at (E.D. Pa. Apr. 15, 1998))
• “The role of a damages expert is to calculate hypothetical damages given an assumed set of facts; so long as those assumed facts are reasonably based on the evidence in the record, such assumptions are permissible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).