Briley v. Farabow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deeming that a claim was submitted to the contracting officer within the meaning of the CDA even though the claim was embodied in letter addressed to another official in the contracting officer’s office
• Contractor satisfied CDA § 605(a) despite the fact that its letter was addressed to OIC supervising contract work as opposed to the contracting officer, where letter expressly “commits the claim to the contracting officer for a final decision”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).