· 9/30/1986
Brignoli v. Balch Hardy and Scheinman, Inc.
Citations
- 645 F. Supp. 1201
- 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19669
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a breach of an agreement of confidentiality is not equivalent to a copyright claim for preemption purposes.
- a claim alleging “a breach of ... [a] duty of confidentiality is not equivalent to' a copyright claim”
- “Nevertheless, [the] plaintiffs’ . . . breach of contract claims . . . involve an element beyond unauthorized reproduction and use—a promise to pay plaintiff for use of his product.”
- contractual term is “extra element”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sweet
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.