Skip to main content
· 9/30/1986

Brignoli v. Balch Hardy and Scheinman, Inc.

Citations

  • 645 F. Supp. 1201
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19669

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a breach of an agreement of confidentiality is not equivalent to a copyright claim for preemption purposes.
  • a claim alleging “a breach of ... [a] duty of confidentiality is not equivalent to' a copyright claim”
  • “Nevertheless, [the] plaintiffs’ . . . breach of contract claims . . . involve an element beyond unauthorized reproduction and use—a promise to pay plaintiff for use of his product.”
  • contractual term is “extra element”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sweet

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.