Skip to main content
· 3/12/1980

Brighton v. Schoffstall

Citations

  • 401 N.E.2d 84
  • 74 Ind. Dec. 497
  • 1980 Ind. App. LEXIS 1342

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that courts are prohibited from expanding or contracting the plain meaning of a statute by either reading into it language to correct supposed omissions or defects or substituting language it feels the Legislature may have intended

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robertson, Neal, Ratliff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.