Skip to main content
· 4/30/1951

Bright v. Perkins

Citations

  • 218 Ark. 856
  • 239 S.W.2d 281
  • 1951 Ark. LEXIS 434

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing the trial court for denying the mall’s summary judgment motion under these facts
  • summary judgment appropriate where plaintiff failed to introduce evidence of facts that would have put a defendant on notice of the potential hazard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.